Stacey Diagram Analysis in Action: Bev’s Next Move
Bev’s project is off to a great start, but she’s hit a few snags.
- Stakeholder opinions are all over the place. Departments have different priorities and expectations.
- There are a bunch of new technologies to choose from, and no one knows exactly how to implement them.
- The business needs are changing so fast that the project requirements are constantly evolving.
To figure out how to manage her project, Bev turns to the Stacey Matrix. This tool helps her determine the best management approach based on how sure she is about the project and how much agreement there is among stakeholders.
How Does the Stacey Matrix Work?
The Stacey Matrix looks at two things:
- How sure are we about the cause-and-effect relationships in the project?
- How much agreement do stakeholders have on the project’s goals and methods?
Based on these two things, projects can be categorized as:
- Simple: High certainty and agreement.
- Complicated: High certainty but low agreement.
- Complex: Low certainty and agreement.
- Chaotic: Very low certainty and agreement.
Bev’s Project Analysis
Bev looks at her project and finds these components:
- Data Backup Implementation: Clear requirements and known solutions.
- Cloud Provider Selection: Unclear best practices with differing stakeholder opinions.
- Data Governance Framework: Evolving regulations and organizational disagreements make this tricky to define.
- Security Breach Response: Requires immediate action with minimal information.
She puts these components on the Stacey Matrix:
| Component | Agreement | Certainty | Zone | Approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data backup implementation | High | High | Simple | Document & execute as SOP |
| Cloud provider selection | Low | Medium | Complicated | Run expert assessments |
| Data governance framework | Low | Low | Complex | Host workshops, use Agile |
| Security breach response | Very Low | Very Low | Chaotic | Create rapid response protocols |
Bev’s project management approach is based on the Stacey Matrix, which categorizes projects into four zones: Simple, Complicated, Complex and Chaotic. Here’s how she uses this matrix to manage different projects:
-
Simple Zone (Data Backup Implementation): Bev uses traditional project management methods like the Waterfall model. She follows established best practices and procedures.
-
Complicated Zone (Cloud Provider Selection): Bev engages experts to analyze and determine the best migration path. She also facilitates stakeholder workshops to build consensus.
-
Complex Zone (Data Governance Framework): Bev uses Agile methodologies to iteratively develop governance policies. She facilitates cross-functional collaboration to reconcile regulatory requirements, internal disagreements, and evolving business needs.
-
Chaotic Zone (Security Breach Response): Bev designs crisis playbooks to enable immediate action. In these situations, there’s no time for analysis—swift decisions and leadership are key. Once stability is restored, Bev retrospectively analyzes what happened and adjusts policies accordingly.
By applying the Stacey Matrix, Bev achieves several outcomes:
-
Improved Efficiency: By categorizing projects into zones, Bev ensures that each project is managed according to its specific needs.
Enhanced Clarity: Understanding the nature of each project component allows her to select the appropriate strategy.
-
Enhanced Effectiveness: Each zone has a distinct set of tools and techniques that are most effective for its specific needs.
-
Improved Stakeholder Engagement: Tailored approaches foster better communication and collaboration.
-
Adaptive Management: Flexibility in methods leads to more effective handling of uncertainties.
Bev’s application of the Stacey Matrix shows how project managers can navigate complexity by assessing the level of certainty and agreement in their projects. This strategic approach enables the selection of suitable management methods, leading to successful project outcomes.